Everyone was already faced with such an overwhelmingly disappointing situation.
Who could still confront the matters at hand and respond with what they thought might be the most appropriate solution to the problem?
If one then proposes other explanations or understandings that seem more fitting, wouldn't that render further adequate consideration unnecessary?
As a result, thinking often, in these scenarios, ceases to require more questioning of understanding.
Such is the situation; exploration no longer holds the necessity of recognition or analysis by others.
He had already accepted this way of appropriately explaining the situation, or clearly understanding it.
Rendering other explanations, which seemed more fitting and satisfying, for the problems, or deeper analysis, increasingly unnecessary.
Then, does he still need to face the matters in front of him again? What kind of clearer and more suitable explanation of the situation would even be required?
