After listening to Lin Sizhi's analysis, Cheng Wen couldn't help but have a sudden realization.
His initial thoughts were actually correct, but he had overlooked something.
The game clearly stated its role in 'filtering out Imitators', and many people guessed that this filtering was mostly achieved through 'how much visa time the Imitator can earn from players'.
Cheng Wen only considered the first layer at the beginning:
Because there is competition among Imitators, to earn visa time, ensuring that players come to play is the first step. Smart Imitators would definitely set very low rake and transaction taxes.
Some extreme Imitators might even completely eliminate the rake, and set a transaction tax of 10%, which is quite an extreme situation.
But there is actually a second layer:
This internal competition is risky; what if everyone sets their transaction tax at 10%?
